Adm. 10c

Thursday, 9 September 2010        

Fluoride Australia - Article Discussion

News Banner - For the people
Australian Fluoride MapCartoonsEden - Organic Seeds | Queensland
Home Page|Media Releases|Researched  Facts Published|Submit Article|About Us | Contact|Latest Posts

Brisbane given Fluoride overdose on May 2
Published 16/05/2009 Location: Queensland The Courier Mail Visit the origional article

Written by Patrick Lion & Peter Michael

THE Bligh Government's handling of the fluoride overdose was in disarray last night after it admitted it got the date wrong about when the bungle occurred.

The Government has admitted residents should have been told they may have drunk water with 20 times the allowable amount of fluoride on May 2 - not May 1 as Premier Anna Bligh said on Thursday.

The blunder is a major embarrassment for the Government, already defending the two-week delay in testing that preceeded this week's health notification to residents on Brisbane's northside.

The Premier was unavailable last night but SEQ Water Grid Manager director Nicole Davis confirmed the water entered supplies in the Brendale and Warner areas on May 2 for three hours between 9am and midday.

It means the water flowed on the Saturday morning putting many more residents at risk.

''We were trying to get the information out there to assure people,'' Ms Davis said. ''The initial advice was it was May 1 but LinkWater went back today looking at their data and discovered the error that it was, in fact, May 2.

''I do apologise on behalf of the (SEQ Water Grid) Manager that there has been confusion for the community.''

The error is set to inflame tensions further. As angry residents yesterday claimed the overdose made them sick and killed their pets, it emerged they may be unable to sue for compensation.

Sick as a dog
SICK as a dog ... Caroline Rossiter, with Shadow, says the entire family fell sick after drinking over-fluoridated water. Picture: Glenn Barnes/Reuters

The Government has specifically legislated to stop lawsuits relating to fluoride.

While Ms Bligh had earlier refused to speculate on compensation for the 4000 homes exposed to the water, lawyers believe Section 94 of the Water Fluoridation Act ruled out civil suits from the public.

''A person does not have any civil right or remedy against a public potable water supplier in relation to the fluoridation of a public potable water supply under this Act,'' the law reads.

The water contained 30 to 31mg/L of fluoride instead of the maximum allowable 1.5mg/L.

The Government had received no complaints yesterday but The Courier-Mail has received several reports of symptoms similar to gastroenteritis.

Warner mother-of-two Caroline Rossiter said her family, including the dog and cat, had been ill for two weeks.

"I was for fluoride but now I am very concerned," she said. "I have headaches, chest pain, shortness of breath, gastro. We still haven't been contacted about it."

Robert Gow, a Bunya resident near Warner, said 10 of his budgerigars died and his cockatiel was sick. His daughter Renee lives at Warner and her budgerigar also died.

"All the birds basically got the runs with lots of watery discharge in the cage and they were dehydrated," Mr Gow said. "There is a pretty fair chance of a connection as we are all connected to the North Pine Dam."

But Ms Bligh said there was "almost a zero chance" of any health risk.


Article Response
Article Views  466 Views
Agree       1 Agree
DisAgree       0 Disagree
Neutral       0 Neutral
View Point - Article Summary by Admin 24/06/2009
This is maddness. Sure accidents happen and everyone understands that. The thing is the government is forcing mediaction and when they risk the lives of the public they are not accountable. You cant sue them!

  Have Your Say - Add Comment (all fields mandatory)  
Name About your privacyOpen in new window - Read our privacy policy    
Email (email not published)      
Comment
(Max 1000 )

Email me futher comments on this article

 

Support View Point?
  Yes Yes
  No No
  Neutral None
 
  Please enter security word before sending
enter this word
     
Comments Posted Select a page Comments Page is 1

NeutralAFAM (Saturday, 12 December 2009 )
All too common: www.fluoridealert.org/health/accidents

AgreeWill H. (Saturday, 12 December 2009 )
I doubt very much if they cannot be made accountable.We the PEOPLE have rights.
Who would call that a Law? It is a self made rule and deserves a Test-Case!
Besides what was put into the water was NOT fluoride, and this chemical is accumulative, there will therefore be problems in the future with thyroid and other glands let alone the brain.Shocking to say otherwise.For those effected use chlorella,spirulina and do the research to find a binder to get it out of your system.

NeutralAFAM (Saturday, 12 December 2009 )
Hey Will, Google the following: austlit fluoridation act 1973, then read Section 4 of the Act, Protection from Rights of Action.
www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/vic/consol_act/ha1973201/s4.html
These people deserve a firing squad.

 
L Associated sites and sponsors L
Link - Fluoride Action Network
Fluoride Free Murray River

Victorian Fluoride Action GroupAnti-Fluoridation Association of Mildura

BARWON FREEDOM FROM FLUORIDATION

Home Page - Logo Fluoride Australia
created by
Build9 Webdesign Logo

dash
Main Site links Latest Articles and Comments Archives Articles About this Site